Workplace policies

You are currently browsing the archive for the Workplace policies category.

104px-doctors_stethoscope_2One of the more controversial aspects of the proposed change to employment law concerns the prospect of an employer asking an employee for a sick note after an absence of one day. 

Kate Wilkinson, the Minister of Labour, says that the suggestion that every employee will be asked to provide a medical certificate whenever they are sick is ridiculous.  Amongst other things, the Minister rightfully points out that employers simply won’t want to waste time and money requiring every worker to go and see a doctor (at the employer’s expense) when they have a day off for sickness. 

In contrast, Andrew Little (National Secretary of the EPMU and Labour Party President) says that the measure is impractical, and that “the cuddly nanny state has given way to school ma’am finger-wagging”. 

Rather than being a legal issue, this is probably something of a political question – and one of perception.  You may have your own views about the practicalities of the proposed change. 

What I did think I could offer to the debate, however, is a reflection upon developments in the UK around the presentation of sick notes.  Have a look here to see the way in which legislative amendments have resulted in doctors in the UK being significantly constrained in the information they may provide to employers by way of sick notes – to the point that they are now only allowed to indicate whether a worker is “fit” or “unfit” for work. 

One would think that the obligation of good faith (especially the need to be open and communicative about workplace matters) would require both employees and their doctors alike to be a little bit more forthcoming in the information provided – even where an absence is only for one day.

 

 

77px-pl_podziemny_krag_okladkaIt is unusual for an HR blog to leave you both laughing your head off – and also thinking about a sage piece of wisdom.
This description is true of a recent post by the HR Capitalist about employees who are good at keeping secrets.
On the list of highly rated employees in this regard:  Dick Cheney, Tony Soprano, Bruce Wayne’s butler, and Tiger Woods’ limo driver.
Have a read of this article – which is loosely based on the policy behind the Fight Club – and see if any of your employees would be fit in that category

104px-doctors_stethoscope_2Here’s an issue that I’m sure has confronted almost every HR professional (and employment lawyer) at some time:  what to do about a rather non-specific doctor’s note certifying an employee as “unfit for work”. 

From the employer’s point of view, of course, you want a bit of information.  What is wrong with the person?  Could it be related to the workplace?  When (realistically) could they be expected to return? 

These are all issues which, in different ways, have been considered under New Zealand law – but a development this month in the UK is taking things a step further over there. 

A new system which is now in force in the United Kingdom only allows doctors to complete a prescribed fitness note – which either certifies an employee as “unfit for work” or “may be fit for some work”. 

Like anything, I’m sure that there is a rationale that has led to this conclusion – and it is possibly something that we could learn from in this country.  To read a bit more about it, have a look at this article in Personnel Today.

86px-referee_penaltyAs a general rule of thumb, people who blow whistles come in for a good deal of criticism and dislike.
A sports referee, for example, will seldom earn the affection of those whom he or she controls.  A rigorous enforcement of rules quite often results in discontent, and sometimes acrimony. 
In this light consider, if you will, the lot of Steve Walsh at the moment.
So it is against that background that the “whistle blowing legislation” (more properly known as the Protected Disclosures Act 2000) could possibly create a bad impression.

Read the rest of this entry »

flogging_a_dead_horseFlogging a Dead Horse is the name of a compilation album of Sex Pistols’ songs which came out in 1980. 
The album is, of course, named after an idiom which broadly means that a particular line of conversation is finished, and any attempt to continue it is futile.
In the case of the Sex Pistols, the title was apt simply because – despite fans’ desire for more music – the group was finished.  Not long after the album was released Sid Vicious died, and Johnny Rotten took a different musical direction. No point, therefore, in asking for any more. 
In a similar vein, it is quite often difficult for employees to let go of the thought of a workplace in which they have worked – and thrived – for some time.  In a time where redundancy is an unfortunate, but common, end for many, letting go of one’s previous work life can be challenging. But, after a certain point, continuing to pursue an employer is like flogging a dead horse. 
An example of this type of concept is provided by the recent decision of the Employment Relations Authority in Wrigley & Kelly v Massey University (Unreported, Employment Relations Authority, Wellington, 6 January 2010).

Read the rest of this entry »

cau5ehc1caog0zujcacpuzumcaxd0mabcajkpvaecann2abecagttnu3caqgxd82ca4f22v1ca1bpprfcavzh13bca7tw0zecakhsmraca74w208ca0i6mmocaiuvktpcaus6e0uca26wl08ca5h9wzsThis is one of those truth being stranger than fiction kind of things. 

The SEC – the American watchdog of Securities and Exchange – is an organisation set up to monitor and correct behaviour.   

Remarkable, therefore, that the employees were given the task of this type of responsibility are, themselves, being a bit irresponsible. Surfing porn, it appears, is rife within the organisation. 

An investigation has disclosed that one employee made more than 1800 attempts to look at pornography on his workplace computer in a 17 day span. 

And it wasn’t just one worker.  More than two dozen employees have been subject to investigations relating to pornography. 

In this day and age is it conceivable that some employees still don’t “get it” around workplace porn?

 

« Older entries