Technology

Technology

facebookSocial media faux pas:  like spitting on someone’s food? 

This – rather blunt – analogy is a proffered this week on the Ohio employer’s law blog by Jon Hyman.   

While you may not necessarily agree with the strength of the comparison, Hyman’s point is simple:  posting derogatory comments about your workplace on a blog or social media site are, at least from the employer’s point of view, pretty much as bad as a wanton act of vandalism at work. 

Hyman offers some thoughts about the essentials of a workplace policy:  but to my mind, there’s one thing missing. 

Monitoring. 

How is the employer necessarily expected to know what an employee is saying on a personal site?  From my experience, most often the boss finds out because of information passed on by others (most notably co‑workers). 

120px-british_airways_747_landing_sfo2c_cropIn what must be yet another reminder to employers and employees alike, 15 staff of British Airways have been suspended for comments made on Facebook around industrial action. 

Employees should – by now, if not before – realise that statements made on a social networking site are “public”, and that disciplinary action can result accordingly.

 

cau5ehc1caog0zujcacpuzumcaxd0mabcajkpvaecann2abecagttnu3caqgxd82ca4f22v1ca1bpprfcavzh13bca7tw0zecakhsmraca74w208ca0i6mmocaiuvktpcaus6e0uca26wl08ca5h9wzsThis is one of those truth being stranger than fiction kind of things. 

The SEC – the American watchdog of Securities and Exchange – is an organisation set up to monitor and correct behaviour.   

Remarkable, therefore, that the employees were given the task of this type of responsibility are, themselves, being a bit irresponsible. Surfing porn, it appears, is rife within the organisation. 

An investigation has disclosed that one employee made more than 1800 attempts to look at pornography on his workplace computer in a 17 day span. 

And it wasn’t just one worker.  More than two dozen employees have been subject to investigations relating to pornography. 

In this day and age is it conceivable that some employees still don’t “get it” around workplace porn?

 

at76c5icasc71cdca01vl07cauv3geecaqi5ebjcapfhc5ucatde25oca051ykhcaj86ltkca4vaee3cavmt882ca4lb6txcagrziarcaiosn2ucar5ejthca5gl8h0ca0g7alpca986qzzcarst0vbcajs3f4vIn case you didn’t see this in the media this week, a hilarious example of why it is important for an employer to enforce its internet viewing policies properly. 

The Australian television network, 7, has a live cross to a Macquarie Bank office as part of its show.  When it made the live cross, an employee in the background was seen looking at some sordid pictures of Australian model Miranda Kerr. 

The employee’s viewing was seen by all of those watching the television broadcast – and the employee is in a little bit of trouble accordingly!

Hell hath no fury…

6a00d8345275cf69e20120a80886f2970b-300wiAn odd story this week from the HR Capitalist about a woman who appears to have taken revenge on a scorned lover by putting up billboards disclosing their affair. 

Kris Dunn ponders whether an employee might do something similar in the event of feeling aggrieved about a workplace issue – and whether, instead of using a billboard, the same type of outcome might be achieved through the use of social media. 

textingwhiledriving_cv_20091102103446A follow up post on the topical issue of txting and driving.

Isn’t it interesting how many conversations have taken place in the last week – after the law changed to make it illegal to use a cell phone whilst driving (without a “hands free” kit).

This week the Wall Street Journal has a story about a poll in America – which suggested that 97% of Americans support the prohibition of txting while driving.  The post also has a sobering tale about a woman who was killed when a car following was distracted by an incoming txt.

« Older entries