<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WorkFace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.workface.co.nz/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.workface.co.nz</link>
	<description>Your employment law update</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Calderbank offers - a new decision</title>
		<link>http://www.workface.co.nz/?p=556</link>
		<comments>http://www.workface.co.nz/?p=556#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Scott-Howman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Courts and tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workface.co.nz/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who know me will appreciate that I have something of a hang-up about costs awards in the employment jurisdiction and, in particular, the place of Calderbank offers.
A decision of the Court of Appeal last week has shed some light about the way in which Calderbank offers will be enforced.  The case – [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.workface.co.nz/?feed=rss2&amp;p=556</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Stigma damages&#8221; - not clowning around</title>
		<link>http://www.workface.co.nz/?p=550</link>
		<comments>http://www.workface.co.nz/?p=550#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Scott-Howman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Courts and tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workface.co.nz/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read an interesting decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal this week – thanks to a referral from the ever interesting English barrister, Daniel Barnett.
The case – Brown v Careham Hall involved consideration of a concept of “stigma damages”.
In simple terms, the concept is that where a person has been dismissed from a job, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.workface.co.nz/?feed=rss2&amp;p=550</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zombie protesters win their claim - the undead are $165,000 better off!</title>
		<link>http://www.workface.co.nz/?p=547</link>
		<comments>http://www.workface.co.nz/?p=547#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Scott-Howman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Courts and tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workface.co.nz/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over recent weeks there has been a little bit of publicity given to the creative protests organized by the CTU concerning fairness at work.  Amongst other things, their rallies have involved speeches, musical performances, dancing and other entertainment.  
All of these different things are, however, relatively tame compared to a protest in the United States [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.workface.co.nz/?feed=rss2&amp;p=547</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
